The intro of chapter 3 compares the
US with the Roman Empire and that historically, all empires collapse after they
become overextended abroad, corrupt, and dictatorial at home. In many ways the
US has become all of these things, with wars we are involved in abroad, spying
on our own citizens using the excuse of terrorism as an reason to circumvent the law
and strip our country of our privacy rights through the Patriot Act, and the
many sex and money scandals of our elected officials. It does indeed make me
wonder if we will end up like so many other empires. Putin seems to be gloating
that he inherited Edward Snowden and many of the U.S.’ valuable secrets.
Interesting too how the Roman empire was
weakened by the influx of different ethnic and linguistic groups who controlled the weakening
empire and eventually took over displacing the Roman emperor altogether, however
the Chinese empire was disrupted by the nomadic peoples establishing “barbarian
states,” but eventually assimilated into the culture and became ethnically
Chinese. I have read where it is much
easier in countries that are homogeneous to establish laws and get everyone on
the same page, and there is much more disagreement and debate in countries like
the U.S. that have a large immigrant population. Not that I would want to live
anywhere else, but relating it to history, this seems to prove accurate.
The discussion in Chapter 4 about
religion and rationality was intriguing. The comparison of the rational, this-world
focused Chinese and Greek philosophers, and the exploration of the unseen
worlds by the Indian, Persian and Jewish intellectuals. All of them were
seeking to define the meaning of life through spiritual or moral realm and all
of these new ways of thinking focused on compassion. However, with the
development of these new ways of thinking it also seemed to establish a ridged hierarchy
and patriarchy. The Confucian answer of the moral example of superiors (men,
wealth, age) to their inferiors (women, status, child) to show sincerity, benevolence
and genuine concern towards those inferior to them, would automatically
motivate the inferior to act with deference and obedience, turns my stomach a
bit. I do agree though that gov’t officials should be chosen from those with
good moral character and intellectual achievement, and not on aristocratic
background (although it seems that only those from wealthy backgrounds could
achieve the education necessary to achieve these positions in gov’t.) It also
seems as though they were seeking work/life balance even back then with the
discussion that a scholar-official pursue Confucianism during the day at his
work, but behave more in the Daoist fashion when returning home at night.
I was hopeful when I began to read
about the Buddhist belief that Buddha challenged the inequalities of the caste
system, and also that he believed the possibility of “awakening” was available
to all. But it goes on to discuss that with the formalization of Buddhism also
came patriarchal rules and inequality, and it seems true of most religions that once teachings were
formalized, distilled, and mainstreamed, that class and gender inequality
became entrenched.
In chapter 5 I was shocked to discover what an
asshole Aristotle was! That women were just infertile males, and passive receptacle of sperm, compared to
domesticated animals or children, unable to be rational or participate in
public life. I wish he was around to see our society today and the powerful
women in it! I truly enjoyed reading about Pericles and Aspasia! What an
enlightened man who could have taught Aristotle a few things about equality!
Chapter 6: The separate but equal definition of the Bantu people in Africa was promising to me and seemed to make for a more egalitarian society. It was less patriarchal and they saw women as having equal value and as a valuable contributor. They also worshipped powerful female ancestral figures. It seems that in all of these societies that once politics, and organized religion were introduced and established, women's status was degraded substantially. I was also disgusted by the amount of human sacrifice that went on in the Mesoamerican civilizations, along with their artistic renditions of these sacrifices.
Chapter 6: The separate but equal definition of the Bantu people in Africa was promising to me and seemed to make for a more egalitarian society. It was less patriarchal and they saw women as having equal value and as a valuable contributor. They also worshipped powerful female ancestral figures. It seems that in all of these societies that once politics, and organized religion were introduced and established, women's status was degraded substantially. I was also disgusted by the amount of human sacrifice that went on in the Mesoamerican civilizations, along with their artistic renditions of these sacrifices.
Excellent blog post!
ReplyDelete